Geologic History and Timing of Mineralization at the Haile Gold Mine, South Carolina
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Research Article| November 01, 2014 Geologic History and Timing of Mineralization at the Haile Gold Mine, South Carolina* Reid M. Mobley; Reid M. Mobley 1Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter St., EWSC617, Columbia, South Carolina 292082Haile Gold Mine Incorporated, 7283 Haile Gold Mine Road, Kershaw, South Carolina 29067 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Gene M. Yogodzinski; Gene M. Yogodzinski † 1Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter St., EWSC617, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 †Corresponding author: e-mail, gyogodzin@geol.sc.edu Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Robert A. Creaser; Robert A. Creaser 3Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar James M. Berry James M. Berry 2Haile Gold Mine Incorporated, 7283 Haile Gold Mine Road, Kershaw, South Carolina 29067 Search for other works by this author on: GSW Google Scholar Author and Article Information Reid M. Mobley 1Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter St., EWSC617, Columbia, South Carolina 292082Haile Gold Mine Incorporated, 7283 Haile Gold Mine Road, Kershaw, South Carolina 29067 Gene M. Yogodzinski † 1Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of South Carolina, 701 Sumter St., EWSC617, Columbia, South Carolina 29208 Robert A. Creaser 3Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E3 James M. Berry 2Haile Gold Mine Incorporated, 7283 Haile Gold Mine Road, Kershaw, South Carolina 29067 †Corresponding author: e-mail, gyogodzin@geol.sc.edu Publisher: Society of Economic Geologists Received: 06 Jun 2013 Accepted: 18 Jan 2014 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Online ISSN: 1554-0774 Print ISSN: 0361-0128 © 2014 Society of Economic Geologists. Economic Geology (2014) 109 (7): 1863–1881. https://doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.109.7.1863 Article history Received: 06 Jun 2013 Accepted: 18 Jan 2014 First Online: 09 Mar 2017 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Search Site Citation Reid M. Mobley, Gene M. Yogodzinski, Robert A. Creaser, James M. Berry; Geologic History and Timing of Mineralization at the Haile Gold Mine, South Carolina. Economic Geology 2014;; 109 (7): 1863–1881. doi: https://doi.org/10.2113/econgeo.109.7.1863 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Refmanager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentBy SocietyEconomic Geology Search Advanced Search Abstract New constraints on the geologic history and timing of mineralization at the Haile gold deposit in South Carolina are provided by radiometric dating of igneous and metamorphic samples using Re-Os, U-Pb, and 40Ar/39Ar methods. Seven Re-Os measurements were made on impure mineral separates of fine-grained molybdenite containing variable quantities of pyrite, pyrrhotite, muscovite, and illite. Four measurements produced an isochron at 548.7 ± 2.0 Ma (MSWD = 1.04). An additional age of 541 ± 2 Ma suggests that molybdenite may have been produced over a ~8 Ma timespan (541–549 Ma), but the preferred interpretation is that molybdenite formed primarily at ~549 Ma. Broadly correlative Mo and Au abundances in drill samples, and the common presence of molybdenite in Au-bearing zones, indicate that Au mineralization at Haile probably also occurred at ~549 Ma. Contrasting Re-Os ages produced at 564 ± 2 and 529 ± 2 Ma are interpreted to be inaccurate, due to the effects of impure mineral separates, and possibly resulting from loss of radiogenic Os from fine-grained molybdenite to other sulfide minerals. Some mobilization and loss of Re, possibly under oxidizing conditions during late Paleozoic metamorphism, may explain two relatively old Re-Os ages determined here and by Stein et al. (1997). Laser ablation dating of zircons from a metavolcanic sample at Haile yielded a weighted mean age of 560 ± 8 Ma. This age is similar to the published time window of 551 to 555 Ma for magmatism at Haile, based on U-Pb zircon dating by ion probe (Ayuso et al., 2005). Similar timing of magmatism and Au mineralization indicates that the hydrothermal systems at Haile were likely driven by magmatism and were therefore not the product of collision, orogeny, and metamorphism. These results confirm that magmatism and mineralization at Haile were active at a time when the Carolina terrane was still in a peri-Gondwana location, well prior to its accretion to eastern Laurasia. Ages of some detrital zircons imply an anomalously young depositional age for the metasedimentary unit that hosts the Haile orebodies (<540 Ma). These ages conflict with an older age of 560 ± 8 Ma determined for the overlying metavolcanic unit. This conflict is interpreted to indicate that folding has overturned the geologic units at Haile. A possible Devonian-age metamorphic event at ~390 Ma is documented by 40Ar-39Ar dating of porphyroblastic biotite collected from mineralized rock at Haile. Zircon ages from the Dutchman Creek Gabbro (weighted mean of 314 ± 2 Ma) and 40Ar-39Ar ages on biotite separates from dikes that crosscut the Haile property (311 ± 3, 311 ± 2 Ma) document a pulse of mafic and alkaline magmatism in the late Carboniferous. These late-stage metamorphic and magmatic events appear to be unrelated to mineralization at Haile. You do not have access to this content, please speak to your institutional administrator if you feel you should have access.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".