Molecular Cloning of Chicken Vasoactive Intestinal Polypeptide Receptor Complementary DNA, Tissue Distribution and Chromosomal Localization1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Chicken vasoactive intestinal polypeptide receptor (VIPR) cDNA was cloned by the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction method using primers designed on the basis of other species of VIPR cDNA. The cDNA obtained was sequenced by the dideoxy-mediated chain-termination method. Of the 2227 nucleotides that were sequenced, 84, 855, and 1338 bases represent the 5'-untranslated region (UTR), the 3'-UTR, and the open reading frame that predicts a peptide of 446 amino acids. The cDNA of the chicken VIPR shows 65% and 60% homologies to human cDNA of VIP1 and VIP2 receptors, respectively. The clone had the expected similarity to highly conserved features of the other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) such as six cysteine residues that are functionally important in the VIPR subfamily. In addition, the seven potential membrane-spanning domains characteristic of the family B group III GPCR superfamily and highly conserved motif within the third cellular loop between transmembrane regions 5 and 6. Northern blot hybridization analysis in this study indicated mRNA expression of VIPRs in the various tissues of the chicken. Strong signal was detected in the brain and anterior pituitary gland. High levels of VIPR mRNA in the brain was consistent with VIP-binding experiments and with the function of VIP in the brain as a neuroendocrine factor or neurotransmitter. Expression of VIPR was detected in the anterior pituitary gland of chick embryos. The expression of VIPR mRNA in the chick anterior pituitary gland may indicate a regulatory function of VIP on prolactin (PRL) production or PRL cell proliferation during embryogenesis. Chicken VIPR shows high homology with mammalian type I VIPR but, in some part, possesses similarity of amino acid sequence. Expression of VIPR in various tissues supports diverse functions for VIP in the chicken.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".