MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050894716 · doi:10.3917/sr.025.0157

Ces lettres démunies de signatures. Représentations et pratiques sociales de l'écriture anonyme fin de siècle

2008· article· fr· W2050894716 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Philippe Artières

Bibliographic record

VenueSociétés & Représentations · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé La non-signature d’une lettre ne résulte pas seulement d’un oubli ; elle peut être volontaire et constituer en cela un acte aussi fort que celui de signer. Cette pratique de signature anonyme, bien connue s’agissant de l’imprimé, est aussi une forme de délinquance graphique. Au XX e siècle ces pratiques ont été au centre d’affaires comme celle d’Angele Laval à Tulle (1921) et associées durablement à la figure de l’hystérie, mais il existe tout un ordinaire de l’écriture anonyme qu’un service policier comme celui de la Brigade mondaine à Paris, à la fois, nourrit et agrège. L’analyse de ces archives met en évidence une autre figure du signataire anonyme comme citoyen de la société de contrôle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.458
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0130.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSociétés & ReprésentationsSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207