Bibliographic record
Abstract
The anogenital area is a common location for pruritic complaints. Specific terms for chronic itch in this location have included pruritus vulvae, pruritus ani, lichen simplex chronicus, and neurodermatitis. A male counterpart to pruritus vulvae, pruritus scroti, is less common. Acute anogenital pruritus is usually caused by infections or contact dermatitis. In chronic pruritus, inflammatory dermatoses and malignancies must be ruled out. In idiopathic anogenital pruritus or neurodermatitis, the skin findings should be limited to lichenification and excoriations. Skin findings may be entirely absent. When treating anogenital pruritus, topic irritants and potential sensitizers must be eliminated. Cleansing and toilet habits must be addressed. A short course of a high-potency topical steroid should bring moderate to complete relief. Sedating antihistamines may limit nighttime symptoms. In some patients, psychotropic agents are required to achieve adequate sedation. Antidepressants may be required in patients refractory to treatment or with underlying psychiatric disorders.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".