MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050926039 · doi:10.1109/nocs.2014.7008785

A novel non-minimal/minimal turn model for highly adaptive routing in 2D NoCs

2014· article· en· W2050926039 on OpenAlexaff
Manoj Kumar, Vijay Laxmi, Manoj Singh Gaur, Masoud Daneshtalab, Seok‐Bum Ko, Mark Zwoliński

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckComputer scienceDependency (UML)DeadlockRouting (electronic design automation)Network on a chipDependency graphDistributed computingDirected acyclic graphComputer networkParallel computingGraphTheoretical computer scienceEmbedded systemAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Networks-on-Chip (NoCs) are emerging as a promising communication paradigm to overcome bottleneck of traditional bus-based interconnects for current micro-architectures (MCSoC and CMP). One of the current issues in NoC routing is the use of acyclic Channel Dependency Graph (CDG) for deadlock freedom. This requirement forces certain routing turns to be prohibited, thus, reducing the degree of adaptiveness. In this paper, we propose a novel non-minimal turn model which allows cycles in CDG provided that Extended Channel Dependency Graph (ECDG) remains acyclic. The proposed turn model reduces number of restrictions on routing turns, hence able to provide path diversity through additional minimal and non-minimal routes between source and destination.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207