MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2050970746 · doi:10.1117/12.717119

Stability of biofunctionalized GaAs surface

2007· article· en· W2050970746 on OpenAlexafffund
Ximing Ding, Jan J. Dubowski

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPassivationSurface modificationPhotoluminescenceMaterials scienceExcimer laserBiomoleculeSemiconductorOptoelectronicsGallium arsenideIrradiationBiosensorX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyNanotechnologyLaserAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical engineeringChemistryLayer (electronics)OpticsChromatography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For a semiconductor based biosensor, functionalization of the surface and the stability of the semiconductor-biomolecule interface are the primary issues to be addressed by researchers. We have investigated a variety of strategies to passivate (001) GaAs surface with a long chain hexadecanethiol (C16H33SH: T16). GaAs substrates were cleaned and etched either with ArF excimer laser irradiation in an atmospheric environment or with conventional wet etchants. The effect of surface passivation and stability of the interface were evaluated using photoluminescence (PL) measurements. Significant cleaning of the (001) GaAs surface has been achieved with an ArF laser, as evidenced by the up to 4-fold increase of the PL signal. This compares to the 12-fold enhancement of the PL signal from samples that were alternately etched in solutions of NH3/H2O and HCl/ethanol. A combination of a diluted base and an acid possibly provides the cleanest surface and therefore the highest surface functionalization efficacy and long term stability upon thiolation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicMolecular Junctions and NanostructuresFrench-language works237,207