Retrospective Review of Unintentional Female Genital Trauma at a Pediatric Referral Center
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: Unintentional female genital trauma is a complaint commonly seen and managed through the emergency department. The purpose of this study was to review all unintentional female genital trauma evaluated at The Hospital for Sick Children for 3.5 years to determine the factors associated with gynecologic consultation and need for operative repair. METHODS: One hundred five patients were identified by health record coding. Data were extracted to study factors associated with gynecologic consultation and operative repair. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the significance of these associations. Surgical choices were also evaluated. RESULTS: Mean age was 5.60 years. Mean time to presentation was 7.05 hours. Straddle injury was the most common mechanism (81.90%), and only 4.76% injuries were penetrating. Of the 105 patients, 48.57% consulted the gynecology section, 19.05% were taken to the operating room, and 6.66% were treated under conscious sedation. Overall, 20.95% required surgical repair. The most common complication was dysuria. Six patients had other injuries, the most common of which were pelvic fractures related to trauma.Factors significantly associated with gynecologic consultation and operative management included older age, transfer to our institution, shorter time to presentation, laceration-type injury, hymenal injury, and larger size of injury. Straddle injuries were significantly less likely to be taken to the operating room. When cases were stratified by a surgeon, there were no significant differences in management. CONCLUSIONS: Unintentional female pediatric genital traumas most commonly result from straddle injuries. Most injuries are minor, and in this cohort, only 48.57% received gynecologic consultation and 19.05% required operative management. Future prospective studies would be useful to better evaluate the efficacy of surgical choices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".