Giovanni Gioviano Pontano (1429–1503) on Astrology and Poetic Authority
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract L'articolo esamina per quale ragione Giovanni Gioviano Pontano (1429–1503) ha spiegato in termini di causalità astrologica l'origine della sua autorità poetica, con lo scopo di illustrare un elemento di continuità tra Medioevo e Umanesimo. I testi presi in esame sono il poema Urania (scritto nel 1475–1494; stampato nel 1505), il dialogo Actius (scritto nel 1495–1499; stampato nel 1507), il commento al Centiloquio pseudotolemaico (scritto nel 1477; stampato nel 1512) e il trattato De Rebus Coelestibus (scritto nel 1475–1495; stampato nel 1512). Si sostiene che l'approccio astrologico all'autorità poetica di Pontano deriva dalla sua interpretazione del primo aforisma del Centiloquio, e che questa scelta era dettata dal tentativo di mettere in questione la teoria del furor poetico di Marsilio Ficino, le cui opere stavano diventando sempre più diffuse nel contesto della Napoli Aragonese alla fine del Quattrocento.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".