Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé L’artisanat dit « local », résultant d’une identité sans cesse réinventée, représente, depuis le début du xix e siècle, une source précieuse d’objets-souvenirs pour des vacanciers soucieux de manifester la preuve d’une expérience maîtrisée de la confrontation avec « l’autre et l’ailleurs ». Entre volonté de mise en valeur d’une situation de dépaysement et proposition d’une image de soi, ce type d’artisanat en dit autant sur la culture du touriste que sur celle de l’autochtone. D’une stratégie de survie économique par l’utilisation de clichés, immédiatement compris par les étrangers, à une démarche de patrimonialisation de savoir-faire, devenus eux-mêmes arguments touristiques, l’artisanat apparaît ici comme le révélateur d’une adhésion à une manière de vivre l’espace vacancier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".