MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051080354 · doi:10.1038/sj.mn.7800201

L‐Selectin: An Emerging Player in Chemokine Function

2003· review· en· W2051080354 on OpenAlexaff
Adil I. Khan, Paul Kubes

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocirculation · 2003
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemokineCell biologyChemotaxisImmunologyBiologyLeukotriene B4InflammationBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The emigration of leukocytes across the blood-endothelium barrier and their subsequent transmigration through the interstitium is a complex process that is vital for maintaining the efficiency of the body's innate and adaptive immunity. The chemokines, a family of low-molecular-weight chemoattractant cytokines, are well recognized to be key players in this process. However, recent investigations have highlighted an important role played by the selectin family of adhesion molecules in enhancing chemokine functions. This review summarizes the in vitro and in vivo studies that support this growing notion. It discusses chemotaxis in the context of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, and their relation to several chemoattractants (i.e., interleukin-8, leukotriene-B(4), formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine, keratinocyte-derived cytokine, and macrophage inflammatory protein-2), the possible role played by L-selectin, and finally how chemotaxis can be altered in different inflammatory settings, such as lipopolysaccharide-mediated endotoxemia or chronic vasculitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocirculationSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207