Measurement of CTOA of Pipe Steels Using MDCB and DWTT Specimens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Two types of specimen for crack tip opening angle (CTOA) measurement have been investigated for pipeline applications, i.e., the modified double cantilever beam (MDCB) (at NIST) and the drop-weight tear test (DWTT) specimen (at CANMET). Results of effects of specimen types, thicknesses and loading rates on CTOA are summarized and discussed. The main observations include: (i) For both MDCB and DWTT specimens tested at quasi-static loading rate, crack front tunnelling (i.e., with a deep triangular crack-tip shape) was present in high-strength steels; (ii) For DWTT specimens, CTOA values measured optically at the surface were significantly higher than those from the simplified single-specimen method (S-SSM) and those measured at mid-thickness [on sections cut using electric discharge machining (EDM)]; and (iii) CTOA values from surface measurement of MDCB specimens were comparable to those derived from S-SSM of DWTT specimens, but the surface values of DWTT were higher than those of MDCB specimens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".