MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051123539 · doi:10.1063/pt.3.1146

Some fine points on radiative forcing

2011· article· en· W2051123539 on OpenAlexaff
Hardy B. Granberg

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Today · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtmospheric sciencesRadiative forcingSkyTroposphereAstrophysicsEnvironmental sciencePhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On the basis of radiation transfer theory, Raymond Pierrehumbert (PHYSICS TODAY, January 2011, page 33) claims that as the ditch in emission spectra seen from space widens, increased atmospheric carbon dioxide renders Earth’s cooling less efficient. Across the ditch, emission by CO2 varies with the temperatures of the strata from which the emission occurs. As the concentration of CO2 increases, its emission to space takes place from progressively higher levels. Near the edge of the ditch, where the emission is from the troposphere, the levels become colder. However, across the 14.5- to 15.5-μm (650–690 cm−1) band they become warmer.From 1970 to 1997, CO2 increased by about half of its glacial–interglacial range. The clear-sky ditch became wider11. J. E. Harries, H. E. Brindley, P. J. Sagoo, R. J. Bantges, Nature 410 6826 355 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35066553 but also shallower,22. H. E. Brindley, R. P. Allan, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 129 594 2971 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.216 and Earth’s cooling became slightly more efficient. When the effects of clouds are included, the brightness temperature across the atmospheric window is some 30 °C colder than seen in Pierrehumbert’s figure 3a. Clouds partly obscure emissions by CO2 from the troposphere, rendering the widening of the ditch less important than the figure would suggest. Above broadband emitters colder than around –55 °C, the ditch becomes a dike33. J. T. Houghton, The Physics of Atmospheres Cambridge U. Press, New York (1977), fig. 12.3c. and CO2 cools rather than warms the planet. REFERENCESSection:ChooseTop of pageREFERENCES <<1. J. E. Harries, H. E. Brindley, P. J. Sagoo, R. J. Bantges, Nature 410 6826 355 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1038/35066553 , Google ScholarCrossref, ISI2. H. E. Brindley, R. P. Allan, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 129 594 2971 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1256/qj.02.216 , Google ScholarCrossref3. J. T. Houghton, The Physics of Atmospheres Cambridge U. Press, New York (1977), fig. 12.3c. Google Scholar© 2011 American Institute of Physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.005
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics TodaySame topicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas DynamicsFrench-language works237,207