MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051125802 · doi:10.1080/13698240008402437

Building confidence amidst Africa's civil wars: The opportunities and constraints

2000· article· en· W2051125802 on OpenAlexaff
Ian S. Spears

Bibliographic record

VenueCivil Wars · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConflict resolutionPolitical scienceSpanish Civil WarResolution (logic)Political economySociologyLawComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Confidence building measures (CBMs) are frequently criticized as being superfluous to processes of conflict resolution. This article argues that, on the contrary, in the uncertainties of civil wars, CBMs have an important role in stabilising peace processes. It seeks to fill a vacuum in the literature on confidence building by considering specifically African contexts of conflict resolution. The essay outlines the central obstacles to building confidence in African contexts and provides an initial catalogue of CBMs and security building measures (CSBMs). In addition, various supporting conditions are highlighted which allow CBMs to be utilized with greater effectiveness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.869
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCivil WarsSame topicGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsFrench-language works237,207