Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nuclear fusion is nowadays one of the newest and most promising clean energies, composing a new application area of Control Engineering, with new and interesting challenges for the control community. In this sense, this paper deals with the modeling of tokamak nuclear fusion reactors. In order to control the creation of unstable modes in fusion processes, it is necessary to derive numerical models suitable for control strategies. The model presented addresses flux and energy conservation issues, discussing the mechanisms behind the creation of uncontrollable modes. The dynamics of the system is given by means of the energy functions which are solved for the currents in the structure, plasma current and plasma position. Thus, the equations for the state variables are derived based on the Hamiltonian equation of motion. In order to solve numerically, this model is linearised around an operation point by taking a Newton-Raphson step. Besides, the system output is completed by considering the equations for the flux and the poloidal field. Finally, the resulting low-order linear model is modified so as to obtain the corresponding state-space model which is verified by means of numerical simulations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it