MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051144254 · doi:10.1063/1.1836854

Measurement accuracy analysis of photocarrier radiometric determination of electronic transport parameters of silicon wafers

2004· article· en· W2051144254 on OpenAlexaff
Bincheng Li, Derrick Shaughnessy, Andreas Mandelis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicThermography and Photoacoustic Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWaferCarrier lifetimeDiffusionSiliconMaterials scienceCharge carrierOpticsAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryOptoelectronicsPhysicsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Simulations are performed to investigate the accuracy of the simultaneous determination of the electronic transport properties (the carrier lifetime, the carrier diffusion coefficient, and the front and rear surface recombination velocities) of silicon wafers by means of the photocarrier radiometry (PCR) technique through fitting frequency-scan data to a rigorous model via a multi-parameter fitting process. The uncertainties of the fitted parameter values are analyzed by calculating the dependence of the square variance including both amplitude and phase variances on the electronic transport properties. Simulation results show that the ability of the PCR to accurately determine carrier lifetimes gradually decreases for lifetimes longer than roughly 100 microseconds. In case the carrier diffusion coefficient is previously known, the carrier lifetime and front surface recombination velocity can be determined with uncertainties approximately ±20% or less. Experiments with an ion-implanted silicon wafer were performed and the carrier lifetime and front surface recombination velocity were determined with estimated uncertainties approximately ±30% and ±15%, respectively.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.348
Threshold uncertainty score0.505

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations51
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicThermography and Photoacoustic TechniquesFrench-language works237,207