MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051151132 · doi:10.1109/twc.2015.2403371

Joint Spectrum Sharing and Power Allocation for OFDM-Based Two-Way Relaying

2015· article· en· W2051151132 on OpenAlexaff
Ruhallah AliHemmati, Shahram Shahbazpanahi, Min Dong

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeamformingRelayComputer scienceTransmitter power outputMathematical optimizationTransceiverPower (physics)Iterative methodOrthogonal frequency-division multiplexingConstraint (computer-aided design)Optimization problemWirelessAlgorithmMathematicsComputer networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)Transmitter

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Considering a bidirectional amplify-and-forward based multi-carrier multi-relay network, we formulate two different joint power allocation and network beamforming problems. In the first formulation, we aim to minimize the total transmit power of the network, subject to two constraints on the transceiver rates. In the second problem, our goal is to maximize the sum-rate of the two transceivers subject to a constraint on the total network transmit power. In both problems, the design parameters include the relay beamforming weights and the transceiver power allocations over all subcarriers. We propose a two-step iterative method to tackle each problem and show that each method leads to (at least) a locally optimum solution. Each iterative method alternates between solving the underlying problem for one set of variables while the other set is fixed and vice versa. Each subproblem is shown to be amenable to a computationally efficient solution. Our simulation results show the efficiency of the proposed techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.894

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207