MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051177852 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450780407

Chemical reactors of special geometry for the precipitation of mineral particles

2000· article· en· W2051177852 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean‐Marc Rousseaux, Hervé Muhr, Edouard Plasari

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMinerals Flotation and Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBoehmiteMaterials scienceMixing (physics)SupersaturationParticle (ecology)PorosityPrecipitationChemical reactorParticle sizeParticle-size distributionRushton turbineMineralogyChemical engineeringMechanicsThermodynamicsChemistryComposite materialTurbulenceGeologyPhysicsMeteorology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Precipitation of pseudo‐boehmite particles is experimentally investigated. The experiments have been carried out in three chemical reactors specially designed to achieve an effective control of the properties of mineral particles produced by precipitation. The chemical reactors are the Sliding‐Surface Mixing Device, the Special Rushton Turbine Reactor and the Vortex Effect Reactor. The mixing efficiency of these new mixing devices is experimentally evaluated and the influence of reactor geometries, operating parameters and initial supersaturation on pseudo‐boehmite particle properties is studied. The particle properties evaluated are particle size distribution, crystallite size, BET surface area, porous volume, mean pore radius and particle shape. A comparison of the particle properties obtained with the three reactors is made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.823

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicMinerals Flotation and Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207