MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051179272 · doi:10.1071/rdv22n1ab163

163 DEVELOPMENT OUTCOME AND MITOCHONDRIAL MEMBRANE POTENTIAL IN BOVINE PARTHENOTES SUBMITTED TO MITOCHONDRIAL SUPPLEMENTATION AND DEPLETION AT THE 1-CELL STAGE

2009· article· en· W2051179272 on OpenAlexaff
Lígia Garcia Mesquita, Felipe Perecin, P. R. Adona, Cláudia Lima Verde Leal, Lawrence C. Smith, Flávio Vieira Meirelles

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCegep de Saint Hyacinthe
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCytoplastZygoteMitochondrionBiologyBlastocystCytochalasin BAndrologyCell biologyEmbryogenesisCytoplasmOrganelleEmbryoChemistryMolecular biologyCellBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Apart from supplying ATP for cellular function by establishing a proton gradient across the inner membrane (?mm), mitochondria also play a central role in death pathways of most cells in the organism. Since mitochondria undergo major transformations during early embryogenesis, we hypothesize that the amount of these organelles at the 1-cell stage is correlated to development. Herein we evaluated the impact of mitochondrial supplementation and depletion on embryonic development and ?mm. Immature oocytes were collected from ovaries of slaughtered cows and submitted to in vitro maturation for 26 h and parthenogenetically activated by 5 min exposure to 5 µM ionomycin followed by 3 h culture in 2 mM 6-DMAP (control, C). In order to deplete mitochondria (depletion, D), zygotes were centrifuged (15 min 10,000g in HEPES-SOF with cytochalasin B) and the mitochondria, at the mitochondria-enriched cytoplast fraction (MECF), were partially removed by micro-manipulation. Mitochondria supplementation was performed by introducing the MECF from the depleted zygote into another zygote (supplemented, S). Centrifugation and cytoplasm removal effects (7.1% of volume) were tested using 2 other control groups: centrifuged zygotes (centrifuged control, CC) and aspirated zygotes (aspirated control, AC). Embryos were submitted to Mitotracker CMXRos (500 ?M) staining to measure ?mm levels. Zygotes were cultured in SOF medium for 3, 72, and 168 h in 5% O2, 5% CO2, and 90% N2. Blastocysts were fixed and stained with Hoechst 33342 to count nuclei. At 72 h, development to the 8-cell stage was reduced in CC (41.6%), D (37.0%), and S (33.2%) groups when compared to C (52.5%) and AC (49.3%) control groups (P < 0.05, chi-square). Similar findings were observed at 168 h where the CC (31.9%), D (21.0%), and S (19.1%) group showed reduced development to the blastocyst stage when compared to the C (40.5%) and AC (41.8) control groups (P > 0.05, chi-square). Moreover, nuclear number was significantly reduced in the D (101.6 ± 12.4) and S (102.2 ± 7.8) groups when compared to the C (137.9 ± 6.7) and CC (126.6 ± 7.4) controls. The AC group (112.2 ± 7.8) is similar to CC, D, and S. These results indicate a sensitivity of embryos to changes (i.e. supplementation and depletion) in the number of mitochondria present at the 1-cell stage on further development to the 8-cell and blastocyst stages. With the exception of ?mm of AC blastocysts at 168 (62.8 ± 6.8, P < 0.05; the Tuckey test), all other controls and treated blastocysts showed similar ?mm levels (100.0 ± 6.2; 84.1 ± 8.3; 85.9 ± 6.6; 97.1 ± 19.1, respectively for C, CC, D, and S groups). Although, these results indicate that the ?mm is not affected by the removal or addition of mitochondria. A reduction in cytoplasm volume (only the AC group) seems to adversely affect the ability of mitochondria to sustain normal Fmm levels at the blastocyst stage without affecting development or nuclear number. Together, supplementation and depletion of MECF are detrimental to development through mechanisms independent of mitochondrial ?mm. Financial support: FAPESP-Brazil.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.316
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207