MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2051195861 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2013-4045

Abstract 4045: Hypoxia induces Plk4 expression and promotes immortalization of proliferating cells.

2013· article· en· W2051195861 on OpenAlexaff
Carla O. Rosario, Carol J. Swallow

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyCell biologyCancer research

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Polo-like kinase 4 (Plk4) is a serine/threonine kinase essential for centrosome duplication and cell cycle progression.High tumor expression of Plk4 is associated with poor prognosis in breast, pancreas and colorectal cancer patients. In addition, our laboratory has found evidence for a novel function of Plk4 in promoting cell migration. Endogenous Plk4 transiently localizes to cell protrusions during migration and spreading. Plk4 deficient cells show decreased spreading and migration potential, while Plk4overexpression enhances spreading and migration. While Plk4 is a haploinsufficient tumor suppressor in hepatocellular carcinoma, we hypothesize that Plk4 functions as an oncogene in promoting invasion in other cancer histologies. Solid tumors develop with a microenvironment characterized by regions of chronically and transiently hypoxic cells. It has beensuggested that acute hypoxia drives tumor progression and facilitates metastasis. The objective of this project is to determine if hypoxic conditions affect Plk4 expression and Plk4-dependent cell phenotypes. Methods: Plk4+/+ and Plk4+/−murine embryonic fibroblast (MEFs) were cultured under hypoxic (3% oxygen)or normoxic (21% oxygen)conditions. Real time RT-PCR was used to quantify Plk4 expression. FACS analysis was used to determine ploidy. MEFs were passaged with either a 3T3 protocol (300,000 cells plated every 3d) or a 3T5 protocol (300,000 cells plated every 5d). At each passage, cells were counted, collected for RNA isolation and fixed for flow cytometry (n=2 embryos/genotype for each passaging protocol and condition). Results: Plk4+/+ and Plk4+/− MEFs show increased proliferation when cultured at 3% compared to 21% oxygen. Using a 3T5 protocol under normoxic conditions,Plk4+/+ cells undergo senescence by passage 8 whereas Plk4+/− cells become immortalized. These results are consistent with our previously published data (Rosario et al., PNAS 2010). Using a 3T3 protocol under normoxic conditions, Plk4+/+and Plk4+/−cells grow at a similar rate up to passage 5, after which they senesce. By contrast, during hypoxia, both Pk4+/+ and Plk4+/− MEFs immortalize with the 3T5 or 3T3 protocol. FACS analysis showed no apparent difference in ploidy between Plk4+/+ and Plk4+/−cells growing at 3% oxygen. Plk4 mRNA expression is induced under hypoxic conditions in both wildtype and heterozygous MEFs, compared to normoxic conditions. Conclusions: Culture at 3% oxygen alters the senescence program of MEFs, and induces Plk4 expression. Together, these changes may be sufficient to “rescue” the cytokinesis defect and development of aneuploidy otherwise observed in Plk4+/− MEFs immortalized with 3T5 passaging. The oscillating hypoxic microenvironment typical of solid tumors may facilitate tumor progression in part through induction of Plk4, with consequent augmentation of tumor cell proliferation, migration and metastatic potential. Citation Format: Carla Rosario, Carol J. Swallow. Hypoxia induces Plk4 expression and promotes immortalization of proliferating cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 4045. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-4045

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→