Effects of Enhanced External Counterpulsation on Health-Related Quality of Life Continue 12 Months after Treatment: A Substudy of the Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Multicenter Study of Enhanced External Counterpulsation (MUST-EECP) was the first prospective, randomized, blinded, sham-controlled study of enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) in the treatment of chronic stable angina. We previously reported that EECP therapy lengthens the time to exercise-induced myocardial ischemia and reduces angina. We now describe the effects of EECP therapy versus a sham-treated control group in terms of patients' functioning, their senses of well-being and other Health-Related Quality Of Life (HQOL) parameters from baseline to end of treatment and from baseline to 12 months after treatment. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether a 35-hour course of EECP affects the HQOL of patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease, 12 months following treatment. METHODS: Seventy-one of the 139 patients enrolled in MUST-EECP provided evaluable patient-completed questionnaires at baseline, at the end of treatment, and 12 months post-treatment. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey and the Quality of Life Index-Cardiac Version III were used to assess effects on HQOL. RESULTS: Both groups had similar HQOL scores at baseline. At end of treatment and at 12-month follow up, patients who had active-CP reported greater improvement than those who had inactive-CP in all nine quality of life scales, including ability to perform activities of daily living, ability to work, bodily pain, confidence in health, energy, ability to engage in social activities with family and friends, anxiety and depression, and quality of life issues from the effects of angina on health and functioning. Despite small sample sizes, active-CP patients demonstrated significantly greater improvement at 12 months following treatment in bodily pain, social functioning, and quality of life specific to cardiac patients compared with inactive-CP patients. CONCLUSION: Significant health-related quality of life improvements were measurable up to 12 months after the completion of treatment with EECP. Improvements in this controlled study are consistent with HQOL changes reported in case series and patient registries. Larger studies are warranted.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".