MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051230234 · doi:10.1109/euma.2002.339210

Finite Substrate Microstrip Transmission Line Analysis Using the Characteristic Green's Function-Complex Images Technique

2002· article· en· W2051230234 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Ahmad Shishegar, Reza Faraji‐Dana, Safieddin Safavi‐Naeini

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicElectromagnetic Scattering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrostripGreen's functionMathematical analysisFunction (biology)Transmission lineIntegral equationMathematicsHelmholtz equationMethod of moments (probability theory)Boundary (topology)Helmholtz free energyBoundary value problemRepresentation (politics)GeometryTopology (electrical circuits)OpticsPhysicsComputer scienceTelecommunicationsQuantum mechanicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quasi-static characteristic impedance of a microstrip transmission line on a finite dielectric substrate is calculated by implementing a novel closed-form Green's function in the method of moment (MOM). The Green's function is derived by using the Characteristic Green's Function-complex images (CGF-CI) technique. In this technique, the original 2-D structure is separated into two 1-D layered media surrounding the source. The 1-D Helmholtz's equations are then solved for each of the layered media with proper boundary conditions to find the respective characteristic Green's functions. Combining these 1-D characteristic Green's functions in an integral form gives the spatial Green's function for the original structure. The complex images technique is then applied to this integral form to derive the closed form representation of the spatial Green's function. Since the structure is non-separable, the derived Green's function is an approximate solution especially in the corners. Nevertheless the calculated characteristic impedances show good agreements with other numerical techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectromagnetic Scattering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207