MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051234096 · doi:10.2113/gscanmin.40.5.1522

Review of Water-Rock Interactions, Ore Deposits, and Environmental Geochemistry - A Tribute to David A. Crerar: Roland Hellmann and Scott A. Wood, editors. Geochemical Society, Special Publication No. 7, $US 80, or $US 55 for members of the Geochemical Society, hardbound, ISBN 0-941809-06-4.

2002· article· en· W2051234096 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Robert L. Linnen

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicGeochemistry and Geologic Mapping
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTributeGeochemistryGeologyEnvironmental ethicsArchaeologyHistoryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This is the most recent of the Special Publication Series from the Geochemical Society. The aim of this series is to publish original articles that honor renowned geochemists. This publication, like its predecessors, has achieved its aim and is a fine tribute to Canadian geochemist David Crerar.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian MineralogistSame topicGeochemistry and Geologic MappingFrench-language works237,207