MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051234906 · doi:10.1115/fedsm2002-31160

PIV Measurements in a Confined Jet

2002· article· en· W2051234906 on OpenAlexaff
A.-M. Shinneeb, J. D. Bugg, Ram Balachandar

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic flow and structures
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet (fluid)NozzleMechanicsTurbulenceFlow (mathematics)Rotational symmetryTurbulence kinetic energyBase (topology)GeologyPhysicsOpticsMaterials scienceThermodynamicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper reports PIV measurements made at three locations in an axisymmetric, confined jet that is approaching a free surface from below. The apparatus consists of a tank 40.5 cm × 40.5 cm at its base and 61 cm high. A 9 mm diameter nozzle is centered in the base of the tank and directs a jet of water upwards. The jet produced has a top-hat velocity profile with a maximum deviation of 0.32% of the mean and an axial relative turbulence intensity of 0.60%. The water is removed from the tank by an overflow around the perimeter of the tank. The PIV measurements achieved a spatial resolution of between 0.425–1.08 mm. The measurements show details of the velocity field in three regions of the flow; at the jet exit, near the surface on the centerline of the jet, and near the top corner of the tank. The centerline velocity remains at the exit velocity until ≈5D from the exit. The axial confinement of the jet begins to significantly influence the centerline velocity at ≈13D from the free surface. All entrained fluid is deflected downward from the horizontal surface flow as it approaches the overflow around the perimeter of the tank. This creates a large recirculation region in the upper region of the tank driven by the downward flow along the wall and the upward flow of the jet itself at the center of the tank.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.553
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydraulic flow and structuresFrench-language works237,207