Sciences et technosciences au Québec : Robert Lozé face au progrès
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé Au tournant du siècle, l'économiste Errol Bouchettepublie un roman qui met en scène la première figure d'industriel et de self made man positive de la littérature québécoise. Ce sera l'une des seules avant quelques décennies. Défenseur du progrès dans ses essais (Emparons-nous de l'industrie, L'Évolution économique du Canada français, L'Indépendance économique du Canada française Bouchette se situe dans un courant de pensée dominant au Québec dans le milieu des affaires et qui a sa contrepartie dans le monde littéraire. Tant sur le plan de la pensée que sur le plan de l'écriture, ce roman se démarque sensiblement de ceux qui se publient à l'époque. Toute une série d'idéologèmes, de nature diverse, permettent de refléter la notion de progrès dans le texte. Mais ceci se traduit également dans Robert Lozé par des ambiguïtés et des paradoxes: le roman hésite entre le progrès et la tradition, les États-Unis et le Québec, la science et le mysticisme, affichant ainsi les contradictions de l'utopie sociale rêvée par Bouchette.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".