MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051291133 · doi:10.1134/1.1623870

Optical properties of hydrogenated amorphous carbon films deposited from glow discharge plasma

2003· article· en· W2051291133 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTechnical Physics Letters · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceGlow dischargeAmorphous carbonAmorphous solidFused quartzPlasmaElectronSubstrate (aquarium)Carbon filmRange (aeronautics)Spectral lineCarbon fibersDispersion (optics)QuartzThin filmAtomic physicsOpticsPhysicsChemistryNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical transmission and reflection spectra of the layers of hydrogenated amorphous carbon deposited onto fused quartz substrates from a glow discharge plasma are studied on samples of two series, which differ by the substrate temperatures (200 vs. 400°C) during deposition. The dispersion of the imaginary part of the dielectric function and the spectrum of the effective electron density of states involved in optical transitions are reconstructed. It is shown that this spectrum is adequately described by a sum of two Gaussian contours. The maximum of the first contour falls in the range of low frequencies and reflects the contribution of π electrons to the optical absorption of the material, while the second contour with the maximum in the high-frequency region is assigned to the contribution of σ electrons.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.851

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it