MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051318878 · doi:10.1353/vpr.2006.0027

Selections from The Girl's Own Paper, 1880-1907 (review)

2006· article· en· W2051318878 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Amy C Murphy

Bibliographic record

VenueVictorian periodicals review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAustralian History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGirlScholarshipPeriod (music)PublishingVariety (cybernetics)SociologyHistoryLiteratureArtPsychologyAestheticsComputer scienceLawPolitical scienceArtificial intelligenceDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Selections from The Girl's Own Paper, 1880–1907 Amy C. Murphy (bio) Terri Doughty , ed., Selections from The Girl's Own Paper, 1880–1907 (Peterborough: Broadview Press, 2004), pp. x+184, $24.95 paper. Terri Doughty's collection of selections from The Girl's Own Paper represents an important contribution to New Woman scholarship as well as [End Page 75] gender studies in the Victorian period. The collection contains material previously unavailable to scholars except through archival research. Doughty usefully organizes the wide range of subjects printed in The Girl's Own Paper in several sections, including Household Management, Conduct, Self-Culture, Education, Work, Independent Living, and Health and Sports. In addition, the articles from the periodical are printed as facsimile pages, offering scholars a true sense of what the paper was like for its audience to read: photographs, illustrations, articles on domestic economy, job opportunities for young women, advice columns, and letters all jostle for attention on its pages. The strength of Doughty's collection is that it brings to light the evolving status of women in the late Victorian period, as well as a sense of how the culture could productively assimilate unattached women of marriageable age. In addition, it gives specialists and generalists alike a glimpse into what Doughty terms "girl culture." As Doughty points out in her introduction, The Girl's Own Paper numbered among a variety of publications that targeted a similar audience of young women. Journals such as the Young Englishwoman and Young Ladies' Journal "established a format of mixed short fiction, serial romance, fashion reviews, and articles on household management" (7). These periodicals catered to the interests and concerns of young women, yet also by functioning prescriptively to define their interests and their values, these publications demonstrate the qualities and traits of ideal girls. As Doughty notes, The Girl's Own Paper pushed this further, since it was founded on the purpose of educating and training girls in the "domestic virtues" as well as helping to prepare them for "the responsibilities of womanhood and for a heavenly home." In targeting an audience of lower-and middle-class women, the Paper devotes itself to managing female energies, which, without productive outlets, might constitute a disordering social element. The articles and columns center on domestic management, employment, and suitable leisure activities. Doughty notes that the publication reflects conservative impulses; in light of its publication by the Religious Tract Society, this is not surprising. However, as she also indicates, the magazine also represents a certain kind of progressiveness, in that it "cater[s] to the New Girl's desire for guidance on how to negotiate the changing social status and identity of women" (9). Indeed, the progressive nature of some of the material included in the periodical represents a compelling aspect of these pieces. Scholars will be fascinated, for example, by accounts provided by female workers in a variety of professions. In the section entitled "Work," the accounts included offer scholars a sense of how working women in the period viewed themselves as workers, as well as work itself. Most of these women speak of the necessity to work to support themselves, describing [End Page 76] it as "noble" service, and ultimately as service to their Christian principles and God. Clearly, through casting work in these terms, female workers were able to make sense of their roles as workers in a society uneasy with the implications of female employment. In addition, many of these workers note that they spend their leisure time performing charitable acts for those less fortunate, such as volunteering to care for the sick or sewing for the poor. In this way, it seems that female workers assuage anxiety about the meaning of their employment; almost universally, these accounts show that women work not to fulfill any personal aims or desires, but for the greater good. Also of note are the sections entitled "Self-Culture" and "Independent Living." "Self-Culture" provides advice to young women on how to form a library, the value of study, and the value of demonstrating educational attainments appropriately. On the one hand, "Self-Culture" in general advocates that women attain just enough knowledge to represent...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.238

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0710.045

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVictorian periodicals reviewSame topicAustralian History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207