MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Successful ECT in a Patient With an Orbital Cavernous Hemangioma

2004· review· en· W2051331465 on OpenAlex
Nirmal Kang, Michael J. Passmore

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ect · 2004
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurosurgical Procedures and Complications
Canadian institutionsRiverview Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHemangiomaElectroconvulsive therapyMedicineOrbit (dynamics)Adverse effectVascular malformationBlood pressureSurgeryVascular diseaseAnesthesiaRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There are no cases in the literature describing the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in a patient with an intraorbital vascular mass. We report the clinical course of a 69-year-old female with a cavernous hemangioma of the left orbit who was successfully treated with ECT for major depressive disorder. There were no apparent effects on the orbital hemangioma as a result of ECT-related blood pressure elevations measured up to 195/90 mm Hg despite pretreatment with intravenous esmolol. Modulation of ECT-related cardiovascular changes in the presence of intracranial or intraorbital vascular masses remains advisable to reduce the risk of an adverse vascular event during ECT. The use of propofol anesthesia appears to be preferable in such cases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.932
Threshold uncertainty score0.553

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it