MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051362865 · doi:10.1214/aos/1016120373

The density of multivariate $M$-estimates

2000· article· en· W2051362865 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Annals of Statistics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStatistical and numerical algorithms
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsCorollaryMultivariate statisticsApplied mathematicsInverseFunction (biology)Density estimationPoint processDerivative (finance)Probability density functionStatisticsMathematical analysisCombinatoricsEstimatorGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

When a unique $M$-estimate exists, its density is obtained as a corollary to a more general theorem which asserts that under mild conditions the intensity function of the point process of solutions of the estimating equations exists and is given by the density of the estimating function standardized by multiplying it by the inverse of its derivative. We apply the results to give a result for Huber’s proposal 2 applied to regression and scale estimates. We also give a saddlepoint approximation for the density and use this to give approximations for tail areas for smooth functions of the $M$-estimates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.401
Threshold uncertainty score0.323

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.122
GPT teacher head0.388
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it