MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051368383 · doi:10.5539/ijps.v3n1p113

The Importance of Religious Orientation in Managing Stress

2011· article· en· W2051368383 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shadiya Mohamed Saleh Baqutayan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Psychological Studies · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyBachelorStress (linguistics)PerceptionOrientation (vector space)Social psychologySample (material)Bachelor degreeApplied psychologyDevelopmental psychologyClinical psychologyMathematics education

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study analyzes the academic stress among students. It aims at investigating the effectiveness of religiousorientation in managing stress among them. The sample consists of 218 bachelor’s degree students in Malaysiauniversities. The data were collected from stressful situations questionnaire, role strain measures, and Intrinsicand Extrinsic orientation. Frequency analysis was used to examine level of stress, strain, and religiousorientation. The results indicated that students experience moderate level of stress, strain, and religiousorientation. However, a significant means difference in the perception of male and female students toward thestudy variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.182

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.465
Teacher spread0.337 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Psychological StudiesSame topicReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyFrench-language works237,207