MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051410098 · doi:10.1115/1.4001791

Parameter Uncertainty Modeling Using the Multidimensional Principal Curves

2010· article· en· W2051410098 on OpenAlex
Mohammad Sepasi, Farrokh Sassani, Ryozo Nagamune

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParametric statisticsMathematicsMathematical optimizationNonlinear systemPrincipal component analysisApplied mathematicsTransfer functionOptimization problemLTI system theoryLinear systemMathematical analysisStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a technique to model uncertainties associated with linear time-invariant systems. It is assumed that the uncertainties are only due to parametric variations caused by independent uncertain variables. By assuming that a set of a finite number of rational transfer functions of a fixed order is given, as well as the number of independent uncertain variables that affect the parametric uncertainties, the proposed technique seeks an optimal parametric uncertainty model as a function of uncertain variables that explains the set of transfer functions. Finding such an optimal parametric uncertainty model is formulated as a noncovex optimization problem, which is then solved by a combination of a linear matrix inequality and a nonlinear optimization technique. To find an initial condition for solving this nonconvex problem, the nonlinear principal component analysis based on the multidimensional principal curve is employed. The effectiveness of the proposed technique is verified through both illustrative and practical examples.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.376
Threshold uncertainty score0.440

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it