MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051422030 · doi:10.1109/tip.2006.888333

Matching Pursuit-Based Region-of-Interest Image Coding

2007· article· en· W2051422030 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image Processing Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputational complexity theoryComputer scienceMatching pursuitEncoderCoding (social sciences)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionImage qualityImage (mathematics)Region of interestMultiresolution analysisPattern recognition (psychology)AlgorithmMathematicsWavelet transformWaveletCompressed sensing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Matching pursuit (MP) is a multiresolution signal analysis method and can be used to render a selected region of an image with a specific quality. A novel, scalable, and progressive MP-based region-of-interest image-coding scheme is presented. The method is capable of providing a trade off between rate, distortion, and complexity. The method also provides an interactive way of information refinement for regions of an image with higher receiver's priority. By selecting a proper subset of the huge initial MP dictionary, using the method described in this paper, the complexity burden of MP analysis can be adapted to the computational power of the image encoder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it