MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051451467 · doi:10.1061/40555(2001)114

Emergency Replacement of Ferry Berthing Structures at the Orcas Island Ferry Terminal

2001· article· en· W2051451467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert Harn, Thomas E. Castor, Michael G. Wray

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTerminal (telecommunication)TourismMainland ChinaScheduleService (business)HarbourMainlandSpan (engineering)TelecommunicationsTransport engineeringChinaEngineeringCivil engineeringComputer scienceGeographyBusinessArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Washington State Ferries (WSF) is the largest ferry operator in North America with service between 20 different terminals, including one on Orcas Island, one of the San Juan Islands. Located between Vancouver Island, Canada and the Washington State mainland, Orcas Island is a community of 4,500 and, as a popular tourist destination, the number of people on the island often doubles. Ferry service through the single slip terminal is the main link for getting onto or off of the island and is considered part of the state highway system. This paper presents the planning, design, and construction of the $3.8 million replacement facilities. All activities were conducted within a very aggressive schedule made possible by a cooperative and simultaneous effort between the designers, the construction managers, the contractor, and the ferry operators. Project features included two phases of temporary vehicle service through the construction zone, new support structures for the transfer span, and new steel wingwalls. One other project feature was an innovative ductile batter pile to cap connection for the transfer span support towers to limit the seismic uplift demand.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.229
Threshold uncertainty score0.822

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207