MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051453853 · doi:10.1109/vppc.2013.6671663

Ageing Estimation of Lithium-Ion Batteries Applied to a Three-Wheel PHEV Roadster

2013· article· en· W2051453853 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Nadeau, Maxime R. Dubois, Alain Desrochers, Nicolas Denis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternal resistanceAutomotive engineeringBattery (electricity)Overheating (electricity)Driving cycleLithium-ion batteryElectric vehicleBattery packCyclingCharge cycleVoltageComputer sciencePower (physics)Electrical engineeringEnvironmental scienceAutomotive batteryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Predicting the ageing behaviour of a lithium-ion battery is a challenging difficulty in plug-in hybrid electric vehicles applications. Invoking the expensive price of the energy density linked with considerable performances degradation over cycling, it is worth considering a battery lifetime optimization in the design process. The degradation will materialize by a capacity loss and an increase of the internal resistance. Capacity loss will affect the autonomy of the vehicle while an increase of the internal resistance will lead to an increase of the battery power losses and overheating. In the paper, the lifetime of a PHEV roadster battery pack is estimated by applying a real-life current discharge pattern, instead of the common ageing experiments based on constant current discharge patterns. A current cycle corresponding to a roadster power load has been used as input. This work involves an accelerated ageing experiment of individual LiFePO <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">4</sub> battery cells through cycling. The cycle applied is derived from a speed cycle comprised of three parts: urban roads, rural roads and highways. For more than 1400 cycles, the capacity, internal resistance, voltage, current and temperature have been monitored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.327
Threshold uncertainty score0.602

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207