MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051455848 · doi:10.1287/opre.1080.0617

Joint Design and Pricing on a Network

2008· article· en· W2051455848 on OpenAlex
Luce Brotcorne, Martine Labbé, Patrice Marcotte, Gilles Savard

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueOperations Research · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicSupply Chain and Inventory Management
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalGroup for Research in Decision AnalysisUniversité de Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsJoint (building)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationRevenueProcess (computing)Service (business)Integer (computer science)Relaxation (psychology)Feature (linguistics)Network planning and designOperations researchMicroeconomicsEconomicsBusinessMarketingMathematicsEngineeringTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To optimize revenue, service firms must integrate within their pricing policies the rational reaction of customers to their price schedules. In the airline or telecommunication industry, this process is all the more complex due to interactions resulting from the structure of the supply network. In this paper, we consider a streamlined version of this situation where a firm's decision variables involve both prices and investments. We model this situation as a joint design and pricing problem that we formulate as a mixed-integer bilevel program, and whose properties are investigated. In particular, we take advantage of a feature of the model that allows the development of an algorithmic framework based on Lagrangean relaxation. This approach is entirely novel, and numerical results show that it is capable of solving problems of significant sizes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.230
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.095 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it