MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051478857 · doi:10.3917/rom.145.0037

L'empire de l'ensauvagement : Adieu de Balzac

2009· article· fr· W2051478857 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRomantisme · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHistorical and Scientific Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avec le personnage de Stéphanie de Vandières dans Adieu , Balzac reprend à son compte un thème largement débattu depuis la seconde moitié du XVIII e siècle, celui de l’ « homme sauvage » (en l’occurrence il s’agit ici d’une « fille sauvage ») en qui les relations de proximité entre l’homme et l’animal sont telles qu’elles troublent les limites entre humanité et animalité. Corps ensauvagé et sans contrainte, celui de la jeune femme porte atteinte, particulièrement aux yeux de son amant, aux limites de l’espèce humaine en tant qu’être social. Mais la question de la limite et celle de l’ensauvagement ne se résument pas uniquement à des considérations anthropologiques ou philosophiques, elles hantent le texte à d’autres niveaux, notamment esthétique et poétique. En effet, il s’avère qu’il n’y a pas loin entre le corps de Stéphanie et le corps du roman, l’ensauvagement de l’un figurant métaphoriquement la nature « sauvage » de l’autre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.346
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it