MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051480102 · doi:10.1088/0953-2048/23/8/085010

Irreversibility line of an Ag-doped Hg-based superconductor

2010· article· en· W2051480102 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSuperconductor Science and Technology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPhysics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsDopingMaterials scienceSuperconductivityLine (geometry)Condensed matter physicsOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The effect of doping with Ag of the bulk superconducting Hg0.3La0.7Ba2Ca3(Cu1 − xAgx)4O10 + δ, 0.1 ≤ x ≤ 0.3 phase (Hg-1234) is presented. The lattice parameter a = 3.824 A remains constant, while parameter c was found to increase from c = 19.0225 A (x = 0.0) to 19.08 A (x = 0.3) with the addition of Ag. The variation of Tc versus the c-parameter exhibits a cupola-shaped behavior. The irreversibility line is thermally activated. The logarithmic plot of Hirr versus (1 − Tirr/Tc(0)) shows a crossover temperature reflecting a transition from two- to three-dimensional behavior with increasing temperature. Fitting of the results to different models is discussed. Thermally activated de-pinning according to Matsushita's formula gives the best fit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it