MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051483559 · doi:10.1080/08977190400020229

The IGF-1 receptor and its contributions to metastatic tumor growth—novel approaches to the inhibition of IGF-1R function

2005· review· en· W2051483559 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Corinna Bähr, Bernd Groner

Bibliographic record

VenueGrowth Factors · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork UniversityWilhelm Sander-Stiftung
KeywordsContext (archaeology)Cancer researchMetastasisReceptorReversionInsulin-Like Growth Factor ReceptorGrowth factorBiologyCancer cellCell growthCancerCell biologyPhenotypeInsulin-like growth factorBiochemistryGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Signals originating from the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R) have pleiotropic effects on cell behavior. They regulate cell proliferation, survival, differentiation and transformation. IGF-1R also plays an essential role in the multistep process of cancer cell metastasis. Metastatic spread of tumor cells is the main reason for the high mortality rates associated with cancer. The development of strategies to inhibit this process promises important clinical benefits. Current attempts to block IGF-1R signaling has resulted in the reversion of the transformed phenotype, the induction of apoptosis, the sensitization to chemotherapeutic drugs and the reduction of the metastatic propensity of tumor cells. Since inhibition of IGF-1R has acceptable side effects on normal cells, the IGF-1R represents a favorable target for anticancer therapy. The well known structure and biochemical functions of the receptor suggest diverse strategies for interference. We will discuss strategies which have already been developed and suggest novel approaches based on peptide aptamers. These are peptides selected for specific binding to defined domains of the IGF-1R which offer subtle and specific possibilities to interfere with IGF-1R in the context of experimental tumor therapy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.863
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.130
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGrowth FactorsSame topicGrowth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsFrench-language works237,207