Two procedures for the estimation of the uncertainty of spectral irradiance measurement for UV source calibration
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The measurement uncertainty of the spectral irradiance of an UV lamp is computed by using the law of propagation of uncertainty (LPU) as described in the 'Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement' (GUM), considering only a first-order Taylor series approximation. Since the spectral irradiance model displays a non-linear feature and since an asymmetric probability density function (PDF) is assigned to some input quantities, the usage of another process was required to validate the LPU method. The propagation of distributions using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations, as depicted in the supplement of the GUM (GUM-S1), was found to be a relevant alternative solution. The validation of the LPU method by the MC method is discussed with regard to PDF choices, and the benefit of the MC method over the LPU method is illustrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.026 | 0.021 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it