Potential role and mechanisms of subcellular remodeling in cardiac dysfunction due to ischemic heart disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Several studies have revealed varying degrees of changes in sarcoplasmic reticular and myofibrillar activities, protein content, gene expression and intracellular Ca-handling during cardiac dysfunction due to ischemia-reperfusion (I/R); however, relatively little is known about the sarcolemmal and mitochondrial alterations, as well as their mechanisms in the I/R hearts. Because I/R is associated with oxidative stress and intracellular Ca-overload, it has been indicated that changes in subcellular activities, protein content and gene expression due to I/R are related to both oxidative stress and Ca-overload. Intracellular Ca-overload appears to induce changes in subcellular activities, protein contents and gene expression (subcellular remodeling) by activation of proteases and phospholipases, as well as by affecting the genetic apparatus, whereas oxidative stress is considered to cause oxidation of functional groups of different subcellular proteins in addition to modifying the genetic machinery. Ischemic preconditioning, which is known to depress the development of both intracellular Ca-overload and oxidative stress due to I/R, was observed to attenuate the I/R-induced subcellular remodeling and improve cardiac performance. It is suggested that a combination therapy with antioxidants and interventions, which reduce the development of intracellular Ca-overload, may improve cardiac function by preventing or attenuating the occurrence of subcellular remodeling due to ischemic heart disease. It is proposed that defects in the activities of subcellular organelles may serve as underlying mechanisms for I/R-induced cardiac dysfunction under acute conditions, whereas subcellular remodeling due to alterations in gene expression may explain the impaired cardiac performance under chronic conditions of I/R.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".