MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051522880 · doi:10.1139/p00-049

Dirac spinors and tachyon quantization

2000· article· en· W2051522880 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M C Pant, P. S. Bisht, O. P. S. Negi, B. S. Rajput

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTachyonPhysicsSpinorQuantization (signal processing)Mathematical physicsLorentz transformationSpace (punctuation)Lorentz covarianceObserver (physics)HelicityQuantum mechanicsTheoretical physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dirac spinors for spin-1/2 free tachyons are derived from the Dirac and Klein-Gordon equations in terms of the standard helicity representation of the Poincaré group and superluminal transformations (SLTs). It is shown that the proposed theory of second quantization is Lorentz invariant without inverting the spin-statistics relationship and without introducing indefinite pseudotachyonic states. Second quantized theory of spin-1/2 tachyons in the time-energy representation shows that tachyons are localized in time and that the most natural space for the description of tachyons is T 4 -space. It has been emphasized that on passing from R 4 -space (bradyons) to T 4 -space (tachyons) via either, i.e., complex or real SLTs, tachyons behave in T 4 -space exactly as bradyons do in R 4 -space. T 4 -space can be visualized as an internal space for a subluminal observer while R 4 -space appears as an internal space for a superluminal observer. PACS Nos.: 14.80K, 03.30t

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.437
Threshold uncertainty score0.447

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicNoncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesFrench-language works237,207