MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051531998 · doi:10.3139/217.0055

The Effect of Post-extrusion Conditions in Ribbon Extrusion of Polymer Blends

2006· article· en· W2051531998 on OpenAlex
Daniel E. Ramírez‐Arreola, H. Padilla-López, Rubén González‐Núñez, Denis Rodrigue

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Polymer Processing · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer crystallization and properties
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExtrusionMaterials scienceRibbonComposite materialHigh-density polyethylenePolystyreneIsothermal processDeformation (meteorology)PolyethylenePolymerThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Blends of high density polyethylene and polystyrene were produced via ribbon extrusion to study the effect of post-extrusion conditions on the ribbon final dimensions and morphology. An experimental setup was designed to measure the stretching force as a function of draw ratio and water contact distance for blends of 3, 6 and 9% PS in HDPE. Numerical simulations of the non-isothermal process using Matlab were in good agreement with the experimental data only when both viscous and elastic effects are included. The results show that both draw ratio and water contact distance have a definite influence on the final dimensions of the ribbon and the stretching force. It was found that deformation of the dispersed phase increases with draw ratio, but decreases with water contact distance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.422

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it