Methylmalonic acidemia (MMA) in pregnancy: a case series and literature review
Bibliographic record
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Women with inherited metabolic disorders, including those with previously life-limiting conditions such as MMA, are reaching child-bearing age more often due to advances in early diagnosis and improved pediatric care. Information surrounding maternal and fetal complications associated with the underlying disorders remains largely unexplored. METHODS: Pregnancies affected by maternal MMA were ascertained through study 04-HG-0127 "Clinical and Basic Investigations of Methylmalonic Acidemia and Related Disorders" (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00078078) and via literature review. Prenatal and delivery records in study participants were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventeen pregnancies were identified in women with isolated MMA, including three abortions, one termination, and 13 completed pregnancies [three cases with cblA (four pregnancies), four cases of mut- (one cobalamin responsive, three non-responsive), five cases with unknown type of MMA]. Seventeen percent (3/17) of the pregnancies resulted in a first trimester abortion, while 38.5% (5/13) of the completed pregnancies resulted in preterm deliveries. A cesarean delivery rate of 53.8% (7/13) was noted among the cohort. Fetal distress or nonreassuring fetal status was the indication for 57% (4/7) cesarean deliveries. One patient was reported to have metabolic crisis as well as episodes of mild hyperammonemia. Malformations or adverse outcomes in the progeny were not observed. CONCLUSION: Although there have been a small number of pregnancies identified in women with MMA, the cumulative results suggest that the majority of pregnancies can be complicated by cesarean delivery and increased risk of prematurity. A pregnancy registry could clarify perinatal complications and define management approaches needed to ensure optimal maternal and fetal outcomes in this growing patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.008 | 0.009 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".