MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051546840 · doi:10.1108/03684920210428227

Scaling observation with complex‐valued coefficients: some remarks and prospects

2002· article· en· W2051546840 on OpenAlex
Guy Jumarie

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKybernetes · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Theories and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScalingDimension (graph theory)CyberneticsProcess (computing)Multidimensional scalingStatistical physicsComputer scienceScale invarianceMathematicsTheoretical computer scienceApplied mathematicsAlgorithmArtificial intelligencePure mathematicsStatisticsPhysicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three kinds of observations are usually used in the modelling of general systems: Gallilean observation, observation with informational invariance and scaling observation. All these models presuppose the invariance of the dimension of the system under consideration. The purpose of the present paper is to examine what happens when the observation process increases this dimension. A 1‐D co‐ordinate switches to a 2‐D co‐ordinate. Complex‐valued random variables are used to describe this approach. Prospects of applications are outlined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.454
Threshold uncertainty score0.409

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it