MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051554377 · doi:10.1353/can.2006.0015

Royal Spectacle: The 1860 Visit of the Prince of Wales to Canada and the United States (review)

2006· article· en· W2051554377 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Alan Gordon

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Historical Review · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Art and Culture Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpectacleHistoryNarrativeNothingArgument (complex analysis)Reading (process)Media studiesClassicsArt historyGenealogyLawSociologyArtLiteraturePolitical sciencePhilosophyMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Royal Spectacle: The 1860 Visit of the Prince of Wales to Canada and the United States Alan Gordon Royal Spectacle: The 1860 Visit of the Prince of Wales to Canada and the United States. Ian Radforth. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2004. Pp. 469, illus., b&w, $39.95 Royal Spectacle is a thoroughly researched and well-written account of the North American tour of Edward Albert, Prince of Wales, in 1860. This [End Page 117] was a well-known tour that regularly appears as background elsewhere, but in Ian Radforth's hands takes centre stage. Borrowing from the expanding literature on parades and civic celebrations, the tour becomes for him a means to examine British North American identities, and more. Radforth covers not only the young prince's travels through British North America, but his voyages through the American republic as well. And he covers this four-month odyssey in painstaking detail. There is perhaps too much detail. At 381 pages, the account is a little excessive. The introduction, for instance, explains Radforth's intellectual influences, which really only amount to a list of the obvious titles. There is nothing unique in his choice of reading, and footnotes – a standard tool of scholarly writing – easily convey the same information. It comes off as a bit indulgent. Similarly lengthy portions provide more narrative about the planning and parading during the trip than are really necessary. There are many places where judicious editing could have reduced the minutiae without sacrificing the argument. Moreover, the detail can be uneven. All the discussion of planning means that, in a book that is largely a chronological narrative, it takes 83 pages for our hero to reach Newfoundland. By contrast, his return voyage, a more arduous and dangerous one nervously anticipated in England, takes a merciful 2 pages. Still, Radforth tells the story of the young prince's travels with a certain panache and a wry sense of humour. If at places one is tempted to flip quickly through the pages, at others it makes engrossing reading. The book's great strength is that it turns attention away from the dignitaries to the crowds themselves. Perhaps the greatest contribution to this ever-growing literature on public spectacle is Radforth's effort to capture the reception of the events by the faceless masses. Relying primarily on newspaper accounts, he analyses how journalists viewed the common masses of humanity that everywhere met the prince and tried to stake their claims to legitimacy through an audience with royalty. The best chapter deals with the struggles of Orangemen to parade in colours before the heir to the throne, and the equally determined opposition of Bertie's 'political advisor,' the Duke of Newcastle, to prevent sectarian displays from tainting the monarchy. This is a chapter that reveals the multiple layering of interests in civic celebrations, Orange versus Green, Canadian versus English, and Newcastle against just about everybody. Through these moments of confrontation, Radforth is able to peer into the perceptions of the throngs of journalists covering the events and, reading carefully, divine some understanding of how the crowds understood these issues. But what we find, like many of Radforth's conclusions, is not really new. It turns out that journalists depicted the same events with the same [End Page 118] crowds differently, depending on how they were disposed to see these events. For some, American crowds were enthusiastic, representing the generous hospitality of a free people; for others, the same unruly behaviour showed the dangers of democracy taken too far. Similarly, American women at the balls held in the prince's honour compared favourably and unfavourably to the young women of British North America, depending on who was doing the comparing. But this is not to disparage the whole book. Radforth does hint at further insights than his explicit conclusions reveal. One might be particularly interesting to modern day students of royalty: Edward Albert was, on this tour in particular, one of the first British royals to deal with a key tension within the modern monarchy. Radforth describes that tension succinctly: 'The heir apparent was made to seem both utterly special – the focus of everyone's gaze – and...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.467
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Historical ReviewSame topicHistorical Art and Culture StudiesFrench-language works237,207