MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051565075 · doi:10.7202/018490ar

Mobilité quotidienne dans la communauté métropolitaine de Québec d’adolescents résidant en territoires rurbains

2008· article· fr· W2051565075 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Nabila Bachiri, Carole Després

Bibliographic record

VenueEnfances Familles Générations · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Peu de recherches traitent de la mobilité quotidienne des adolescents en lien avec les caractéristiques du milieu résidentiel et la localisation du milieu scolaire. Cette étude qualitative analyse les pratiques de déplacements de 30 adolescents résidant dans la périphérie de la communauté métropolitaine de Québec, ainsi que les significations qui leur sont attachées. Les résultats confirment une mobilité quotidienne dépendante de l’accompagnement automobile par les parents, mais aussi de l’autobus scolaire. En effet, les longues distances à parcourir dues à la dispersion sur le territoire des commerces, des équipements et des services excluent presque systématiquement le recours à la marche et au vélo utilitaires, alors que l’absence ou l’inefficacité du service décourage le recours au transport en commun. Les conséquences potentielles de cette mobilité dépendante sur le développement et les habitudes de vie des adolescents sont discutées en conclusion, en lien avec des pistes additionnelles de recherche.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations102
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnfances Familles GénérationsSame topicUrban Transport and AccessibilityFrench-language works237,207