MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051584011 · doi:10.1021/jp101096r

β-Lactoglobulin/Folic Acid Complexes: Formation, Characterization, and Biological Implication

2010· article· en· W2051584011 on OpenAlexaff
Li Liang, Muriel Subirade

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPterinChemistryFluorescenceBinding constantWhey proteinBiomoleculeFluorescence spectroscopyCircular dichroismFluorescence anisotropyCrystallographyCofactorBinding siteBiochemistryEnzyme

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Beta-lactoglobulin (beta-LG), the major whey protein in bovine milk, binds to a wide range of compounds. Folic acid (FA) is a synthetic form of the B group vitamin known as folates, which are essential cofactors for a variety of physiological processes. The interaction of beta-LG with FA was studied using fluorescence spectroscopy to determine the FA binding constant and mode and the influence of the protein on FA photodegradation. At < or = 20 microM FA, which may be the critical self-association concentration, the binding constant and number are 2.0 (+/-0.6) x 10(6) M(-1) and 1.30 (+/-0.03) when excited at 280 nm and 4.3 (+/-2.2) x 10(5) M(-1) and 1.17 (+/-0.04) at 295 nm, as determined by protein intrinsic fluorescence. FA binds to the surface of beta-LG, possibly in the groove between the alpha-helix and the beta-barrel. Fluorescence analysis of the pterin portion of FA shows that complexation with beta-LG improves FA photostability. It is suggested that beta-LG complexes could be used as an effective carrier of FA in functional foods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations180
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicFolate and B Vitamins ResearchFrench-language works237,207