MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051627607 · doi:10.1021/ac000736e

Adsorption and Electrosorption of Ethyl Xanthate and Thiocyanate Anions at High-Area Carbon-Cloth Electrodes Studied by in Situ UV Spectroscopy:  Development of Procedures for Wastewater Purification

2001· article· en· W2051627607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicConducting polymers and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChemistryThiocyanateAdsorptionXanthateInorganic chemistryElectrodeKineticsOrganic chemistryPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adsorption and electrosorption behavior of ethyl xanthate (EtX - ) and thiocyanate (SCN - ) anions, individually and when they are together in a solution, were studied at high-area C-cloth electrodes by in situ UV spectroscopy in relation to development of methodologies for purification of industrial wastewaters. The employment of straightforward, yet demonstrably useful spectrophotometric techniques of kinetics and scanning kinetics is described. Adsorption isotherms of EtX - and SCN - were also derived. However, EtX - was found to decompose to a small extent during electrosorption on C-cloth and/or Au or Pt surfaces, causing some interference with the spectrophotometric analysis of SCN - at 215 nm. After long prior contact of the C-cloth with water, the adsorption rates of EtX - and SCN - are somewhat increased. Competitive adsorption studies show that SCN - ion does not become adsorbed on the C-cloth in the presence of EtX -, thus demonstrating a remarkable discriminatory effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.443

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it