MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051659128 · doi:10.1109/iccnc.2013.6504175

Effective capacity optimization for cognitive radio network based on underlay scheme in gamma fading channels

2013· article· en· W2051659128 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2013 International Conference on Computing, Networking and Communications (ICNC) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCognitive Radio Networks and Spectrum Sensing
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnderlayCognitive radioQuality of serviceThroughputComputer scienceComputer networkInterference (communication)FadingTransmitter power outputCognitive networkElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)TransmitterEngineeringWirelessChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As fundamental spectrum sensing and access techniques in cognitive radio networks (CRN) matured in last decade, the satisfaction of quality-of-service (QoS) demands for cognitive users (CU) has attracted lots of research attention. In this paper, we study how the delay QoS requirements affect the dynamic spectrum access (DSA) strategy on network performance. We first treat the delay-QoS in interference constrained cognitive radio network by applying the effective capacity theory, focusing on the dominant DSA scheme: underlay. We show that the roles that the transmit-power/interference-power constraints play in optimizing CUs' throughput vary significantly with the delay QoS requirements. Performance analysis and numerical evaluations are provided to demonstrate the effective capacity of CRN based on underlay scheme, taking into consideration the impact of delay QoS requirements and other related parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it