MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2051674402 · doi:10.1063/1.1473215

Dielectric measurements on oxidized and hydrogenated chemical vapor deposited diamond films

2002· article· en· W2051674402 on OpenAlexaff
Ken Haenen, J. F. Rouleau, M. Nesládek, J. Goyette, L.M. Stals, T. K. Bose

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
FundersVlaamse regering
KeywordsDiamondDielectricMaterials scienceAnnealing (glass)PermittivityAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Chemical vapor depositionConductivityHydrogenThin filmOptoelectronicsChemistryComposite materialNanotechnologyPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The influence of oxidation, hydrogenation, and annealing on the dielectric properties of microwave plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposited diamond films was measured in the 45 MHz–20 GHz range using an open-ended coaxial probe. A dielectric response was detected around 108–109 Hz for the hydrogenated samples, in contrast to the oxidized films, which showed no response in that frequency range. The amplitude and position of the detected response were clearly dependent on the sample quality and the state of the surface. Fitting of the experimental data to the Cole–Cole expression for dielectric relaxation showed a near-Debye behavior of the dielectric permittivity. We propose that the dielectric response is a result of two-dimensional plasmons, corresponding with a hole concentration of ∼1013 cm−2 at the diamond surface, induced by the hydrogen termination. Analogous to the well-known hydrogen-induced surface conductivity, the dielectric signal disappeared after annealing the diamond films at 200 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.594

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied PhysicsSame topicDiamond and Carbon-based Materials ResearchFrench-language works237,207