Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Calcipotriol is a synthetic vitamin D3 analog that binds to vitamin D receptors in epidermal cells. In vitro studies have shown that calcipotriol stimulates terminal cell differentiation and has antiproliferative effects. In vivo, calcipotriol has been shown to reduce the number of cycling epidermal cells. Calcipotriol also has less effect on calcium metabolism than calcitriol, which is the natural, bioactive, 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. Objective: These properties make calcipotriol an ideal candidate for the topical treatment of hyperproliferative skin disorders. While it has been approved for topical use in psoriasis, its potential for use in other dermatological disorders has not yet been fully investigated. Conclusion: This survey of the literature suggests that calcipotriol may show promise in the treatment of other conditions involving abnormal keratinization and hyperproliferation of epidermal cells. While some of these disorders are rare, and therefore difficult to study, further study into the nonpsoriatic uses of calcipotriol may be rewarding. Antécédents: Le calcipotriol est un analogue de la vitamine D3 qui se lie aux récepteurs de la vitamine D dans les cellules épidermiques. Des études in vitro ont démontré que le calcipotriol stimule la différentiation des cellules terminales et a des effets antiprolifératifs. In vivo, le calcipotriol réduit le nombre de cellules épidermiques cycliques. Aussi, le calcipotriol a un moindre effet sur le métabolisme du calcium que le calcitiol, qui est le 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 bioactif naturel. Objectif: Ces caractéristiques font du calcipotriol le médicament de choix pour le traitement topique des dermatoses hyperprolifératives. Bien que l'usage du calcipotriol dans les cas de psoriasis soit approuvé, ses effets sur d'autres maladies cutanées n'est pas encore bien exploré. Conclusion: Cette revue des publications spécialisées suggère que le calcipotriol pourrait être un traitement prometteur pour d'autres maladies présentant une kératinisation anormale et une hyperprolifération des cellules épidermiques. Même si certaines de ces affections sont rares et difficiles à étudier, des études poussées de lusage du calcipotriol dans des cas autres que le.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".